Low-level Laser Therapy Group Research Articles

Comparison of Amount of Space Closure During En- Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Three Accelerated Orthodontic Treatment Techniques- Micro Osteo-Perforation, Photo Bio-Modulation and Peizocision : A Retrospective Study

AIM: The study aimed at comparing the amount of space closure using peizocision (PZ) and micro- osteoperforation (MOP) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Materials and methods: A retrospective study consisted of 3 groups, sample number of minimum 8 patients per group were estimated using statistical model called an Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA model. Three sets of data were collected. Which included patients who were treated with upper first premolar extraction for en- masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using NiTi closed coil spring with regional acceleratory procedures. The data collected was divided into 3 groups, GROUP 1- micro osteo perforations (n=8), GROUP 2- photo bio modulation (n=8), GROUP 3- peizocision (n=8).sing digital Vernier calipers, a direct approach was used to measure all the stone casts obtained before canine retraction (T0) and after the retraction was completed after three months (T1). The statistical analysis was performed on the data acquired about the amount of space closure of en-masse retraction of maxillary anteriors in the PZ, LLLT, and MOP groups. Results: Compared to MOP (2.60mm) and LLLT (2.44mm), the PZ group had a greater mean amount of space closure (5.06mm). In conclusion, the quantity of space closure in piezocision was significantly higher than that in MOP and LLLT, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two. It is imperative that treatment duration be shortened. Finding the most effective and practical method to speed up tooth movement using the biomechanical mechanisms that are currently in place is therefore necessary

Fatigue Alleviation by Low-Level Laser Pre-Exposure in Ischemic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Despite its susceptibility to muscle fatigue, combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and blood flow restriction (BFR) is an effective regimen for managing muscle atrophy when traditional resistance exercises are not feasible. This study investigated the potential of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing muscle fatigue after the application of combined NMES and BFR. Thirty-six healthy adults were divided into control and LLLT groups. The LLLT group received 60 J of 850 nm wavelength LLLT before a training program of combined NMES and BFR of the non-dominant extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL). The control group followed the same protocol but received sham laser therapy. Assessments included maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), ECRL mechanical properties, and isometric force-tracking for wrist extension. The LLLT group exhibited a smaller normalized difference in MVC decrement (-4.01 ± 4.88%) than the control group (-23.85 ± 7.12%) (P < .001). The LLLT group demonstrated a smaller decrease in muscle stiffness of the ECRL compared to the control group, characterized by the smaller normalized changes in frequency (P = .002), stiffness (P = .002), and relaxation measures (P = .011) of mechanical oscillation waves. Unlike the control group, the LLLT group exhibited a smaller post-test increase in force fluctuations during force-tracking (P = .014), linked to the predominant recruitment of low-threshold MUs (P < .001) without fatigue-related increases in the discharge variability of high-threshold MUs (P > .05). LLLT pre-exposure reduces fatigue after combined NMES and BFR, preserving force generation, muscle stiffness, and force scaling. The functional benefits are achieved through fatigue-resistant activation strategies of motor unit recruitment and rate coding.

Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus muscle energy technique among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a parallel group randomised controlled trial

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus is one of the fastest-growing health challenges of the twenty-first century with multifactorial impact including high rates of morbidity and mortality as well as increased healthcare costs. It is associated with musculoskeletal complications, with frozen shoulder being commonly reported. While low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and muscle energy technique (MET) are commonly used to manage  this condition, there remains a lack of agreement on the most effective approach, with limited research available on their comparative efficacy.ObjectivesTo evaluate the comparative effectiveness of LLLT versus MET among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder.MethodsThis is a single-centre, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with three parallel groups to be conducted at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Sixty diabetic patients with frozen shoulder will be randomly assigned into LLLT group, MET group, or control group in a 1:1:1 ratio. All the groups will receive treatment three times weekly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be shoulder function and the secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, shoulder ROM, interleukin-6 (IL-6), depression, anxiety, and quality of life (QoL). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, at post 8-week intervention, and at 3 months follow-up.DiscussionThis will be the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of LLLT versus MET on both clinical and psychological parameters among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder. The findings of the study may provide evidence on the efficacy of these interventions and most likely, the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes, which may guide clinical practice.Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202208562111554). Registered on August 10, 2022.

Comparison Of The Effectiveness Of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) And Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) On Improving Balance In Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND : Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a joint disease with a high prevalence among the elderly. OA can cause balance disorders, which are one of the main causes of falls in the elderly. Balance can be measured using several scoring systems, one of which is the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). One of the treatment modalities for OA is laser therapy which is non-invasive and easy to apply. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) has been widely used in patients with knee OA, but recently high intensity laser therapy (HILT) has begun to be used in physical therapy with advantages over a wider range and depth. AIMS :  to compare the effect of LLLT and HILT therapy on improving functional balance in the elderly with knee OA. METHOD : This research is a randomized controlled trial pre-test and post-test-controlled group design. The sampling method used in this study is the simple random sampling method. The sample size was 27 subjects and divided into two groups, the LLLT group (n=14) and the HILT group (n=13). Each subject received laser therapy sessions 2 times a week for 4 weeks. Balance was assessed using the BBS before and after the intervention. RESULT :  There was an increase in BBS scores before and after treatment in the HILT group (p&lt;0.001) and in the LLLT group (p&lt;0.001), with the increase in the HILT group (7.79 ± 2.16) significantly greater than in the LLLT group (3 .08 ± 0.76) (p&lt;0.001). CONCLUSION : HILT improves balance score better than LLLT.

Combined Effects of Brunnstorm Movement Therapy and Low-Level Laser Therapy on Upper Limb Function and Hand Dexterity in Chronic Stroke Patient

Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, necessitating innovative rehabilitation strategies to enhance recovery and improve quality of life. The integration of Brunnstrom movement therapy and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) presents a novel approach to addressing the complexities of stroke rehabilitation, focusing on improving upper limb function and hand dexterity. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the combined effects of Brunnstrom movement therapy and LLLT on upper limb function and hand dexterity in chronic stroke patients, providing insights into potentially enhancing rehabilitation outcomes. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 48 chronic stroke patients, divided equally into two groups to receive either Brunnstrom movement therapy or LLLT. The study spanned six months, with assessments including the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Nine-Hole Peg Test, Box and Block Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and Handheld Dynamometer. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare outcomes between groups. Results: Significant improvements were noted in both groups, with the LLLT group showing superior performance in the Nine-Hole Peg Test (p&lt;0.001), Box and Block Test (p&lt;0.001), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (p&lt;0.001) compared to baseline. The MAS scores indicated a significant reduction in muscle spasticity over time in both groups, with the LLLT group exhibiting a more substantial decrease (p=0.003 at week 6). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that combining Brunnstrom movement therapy with LLLT could significantly enhance upper limb function and hand dexterity in chronic stroke patients. These findings advocate for the integration of innovative and non-invasive therapies into rehabilitation programs, potentially setting a new benchmark in stroke recovery practices.

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in reducing pain induced by orthodontic separation: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) have been recently applied to control pain during orthodontic treatment.ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the effectiveness of LLLT and LIPUS in reducing pain induced by orthodontic separation.Study designA single-blinded randomized controlled trial.MethodsOne hundred and fifty patients were randomly assigned into three groups; LLLT group, LIPUS group, and control group. After 5 min from the separators’ placement, the first dose of the laser or the ultrasound was applied, the second dose was applied after 24 h, and the third dose was applied after 48 h on both maxillary and mandibular first molars. The exposure of laser was for 20 s at each point (maxillary and mandibular first molars), with an 810-nm aluminum-gallium-arsenide (AlGaAs) diode laser on continuous mode. The output power set at 150 mW, the energy density of 4 J/cm2, and a laser spot diameter of 7 mm were applied. Whereas the frequency of ultrasonic toothbrush was 1.6 MHz; and average output intensity was 0.2 W/cm2. The application was for 20 min (5 min on each first molar). The control group received the separators without another intervention. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS 100 mm) was used to assess pain intensity at several time intervals during the first four days after the separators’ placement.ResultsA total of 145 patients were assessed. There was a significant difference in pain perception among the three groups after 5 min (P = .002). The maximum pain level was reached after 24 h. However, the laser group and the ultrasound group showed a statistically significant decrease in pain scores compared to the control group at all the assessment time points (P < .001). Whereas there was no difference between the laser group and the ultrasound group in reducing the pain scores (P > .05).ConclusionsThe LLLT and the LIPUS effectively reduce the separation pain when applied in multiple doses without differences between them.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID= DRKS00029991). Date of registration: 26/08/2022.

Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Pulsed Ultrasound Combined with Exercise for Osteoarthritis of Knee

Background: A slow loss of cartilage, pain, functional impairment, and a decreased quality of life are allcharacteristics of the degenerative inflammatory sickness- osteoarthritis of the knee, which affects the whole joint.Pulsed ultrasound primarily has properties to boost tissue metabolism, improve the extensibility of tissues thatare fibrous, and raise pain thresholds. Laser beams having a wavelength of between 600 and 800 nanometers areproduced by limited laser treatment. It stimulates regeneration and the release of beta-endorphins by increasingprotein synthesis in synovial fluid.Purpose: To find the effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy and Pulsed Ultrasound combined with exercise forosteoarthritis of knee.Materials and Methods: Total of 60 participants were selected from ACIAN Ortho clinic. According to inclusionand exclusion criteria, the participants were explained about the treatment safety and written consent wasobtained. The participating subjects were divided into two groups, Low Level Laser Therapy with exercise groupand Pulsed Ultrasound with exercise group. All the subjects underwent pretest measurement with ROM andWOMAC at the beginning of the treatment. Study period : November 2022 to April 2023.Results: Statistical analysis of data showed significant differences not only in the Ultrasound group but also in LowLevel Laser Therapy. The Low Level Laser Therapy Group were significantly higher than the Pulsed Ultrasoundgroup, with a p value of &lt;0.0001Conclusion: Low Level Laser Therapy is more effective than Pulsed Ultrasound for osteoarthritis of knee.

Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in Sensory Recovery in Experimentally Induced Peripheral Nerve Injury Rat Model

Background: Peripheral nerve injuries are known to cause significant functional impairment and diminishedsensory recovery, necessitating the exploration of effective therapeutic interventions.Purpose: The purpose of this research is to find the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and low intensitypulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) sensory recovery in an experimentally induced peripheral nerve injury rat model.Materials and Methods: In this study, 18 adult male wistar rats which are divided into LLLT (n = 6), LIPUS (n = 6),and control (n = 6) groups. All rats underwent a standardized procedure to induce peripheral nerve injury, whilethe control group received sham procedures. Hot-Plate test and Cold-Plate Tests were conducted for pre- andpost-operative evaluation of sensory recovery at POD 7, 14, 21 days.Results: The study’s findings revealed that LLLT exhibited significantly improved sensory recovery compared toLIPUS and control groups on POD 14 and 21, indicating its potential as a promising non-invasive intervention formanaging peripheral nerve injuries (P &lt;0.001).Conclusion: The study recommends that LLLT is more effective when compared with LIPUS in promoting sensoryrecovery and enhancing in a rat model of peripheral nerve injury. Positive outcomes indicate LLLT’s potential asa promising intervention for managing peripheral nerve injuries.

Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Associated With the Acceleration of Canine Retraction by Piezosurgery in Comparison With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background and objectives Recently, both surgical and non-surgical interventions have gained popularity in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, but there is no randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing both modalities in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during maxillary canine retraction. Therefore, this trial aimed to assess the PROMs associated with either low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or piezocision-assisted acceleration in the context of maxillary canine retraction. Materials and methods This was a single-blinded, single-center, three-arm RCT. A total of 54 patients (12 males, 42 females, mean age 20.65 ± 2.85) whose treatment needed upper-first-premolar extraction to facilitate canine retraction were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups: piezocision group (PG), LLLT group (LLLTG), and the control group (CG). Standardized questionnaires using a visual analog scale were distributed to patients at five assessment times: 1 (T1), 3 (T2), 7 (T3), 14 (T4), and 28 days following the canine retraction initiation (T5). The patients' pain, discomfort, swelling, chewing difficulty, satisfaction, and acceptance were recorded. Results Regarding pain and discomfort, the levels were significantly lower in the LLLTG during the first two weeks of canine retraction compared to the other two groups (p<0.017). At the same time, these levels were significantly greater in the PG than the CG in the first week of canine retraction (p<0.017). Patients in the PG had a "mild to moderate" perception of swelling at T1 and T2, which was significantly different than that of the other two groups (p<0.001). Regarding chewing difficulty, the levels in the LLLTG were significantly lower than those in PG at the first three assessment times (p<0.017). Patients' satisfaction with canine speed was significantly greater in the intervention groups compared to the CG (p<0.001). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were found between the three groups regarding satisfaction with gum appearance surrounding the canine (p=0.061) and acceptance (p=0.125). Conclusion The LLLT-assisted canine retraction was associated with significantly lower negative patient-reported outcomes during the first two weeks of retraction than piezocision-assisted retraction. However, the levels of pain and discomfort were significantly greater in the piezocision-assisted retraction group than those in the conventional canine retraction group, which in turn were greater than those with the LLLT-assisted canine retraction group during the first week of retraction. Patient satisfaction and acceptance were high with both piezocision and LLLT interventions.

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Laser Therapy, and Ultrasound in Managing Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs) are considered multifactorial, and several treatment approaches have been proposed for their effective management. The use of non invasive treatment modalities is recommended, which includes Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), acupuncture, ultrasound, and manual therapies. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of TENS, LLLT, and ultrasound therapy in patients suffering from TMDs. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomised clinical trial was conducted on thirty patients (11 males, 19 females) clinically diagnosed with TMD associated with Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) pain, clicking joint sound, pain in the muscles of mastication, and limited mouth opening. Patients were sequentially randomised into three groups to be treated with TENS, laser beam, and ultrasound therapies, respectively. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score and painfree mouth opening were recorded before, during, and after treatment. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences(SPSS) version 16.0 statistical software. Statistical tests such as the paired sample t-test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and post-hoc Tukey test were performed. Results: There was a significant reduction in the VAS score in the TENS group (3.15), LLLT group (5.75), and ultrasound group (5.50) post-treatment (p&lt;0.001). In addition, improvements in Mean Mouth Opening (MMO) levels were observed with TENS (7.80 mm), LLLT (9.09 mm), and ultrasound therapy (7.15 mm). These differences were found to be statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). The laser and ultrasound groups fared better than the TENS group in the reduction of VAS scores (p&lt;0.05), and there was no significant difference in MMO among the three therapies. Conclusion: Reductions in VAS scores and improvements in mouth opening were noticed in all three groups post-treatment. The laser and ultrasound therapies were more effective in reducing pain compared to TENS therapy. Comparing pretreatment and mid-treatment values, laser beam therapy proved to be more effective in reducing pain scores compared to TENS and ultrasound therapy.

Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation versus low level laser therapy on shoulder adhesive capsulitis post-neck dissection surgery

IntroductionNeck dissection (ND) operations are performed to treat known metastatic neck illness. These operations have been associated with chronic neck and shoulder problems. In patients who have had a ND, adhesive capsulitis (AC) is one of the causes of shoulder dysfunction.MethodsForty patients with AC following modified radical neck dissection (MRND) surgeries were chosen at random and divided into two groups of equal size. The low-level laser therapy (LLLT) group (group A) received LLLT with: wavelength – 830 nm, output – 50 mw, maximum frequency – 5000 Hz, pulse duration – 50 ns, and average dose – 9 J/cm2 for 20 min, plus traditional physical therapy (mobilisation technique, myofascial release, range of motion (ROM), and strengthening exercises) for 30 min. The proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) group (group B) received PNF for 25–30 min in addition to traditional physical therapy. The treatment period was 3 times each week and lasted for eight weeks. The discomfort in the shoulder was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Shoulder impairment and pain were assessed by the SPADI scale and the shoulder ranges of motion were assessed using the universal goniometer technique. All measures were taken before and after the intervention.ResultsThe findings reveal that there was a significant enhancement in all variables in both groups A and B after therapy compared to before the treatment (p &lt; 0.001). After therapy, there were no obvious changes in the VAS and SPADI values among the groups (p &gt; 0.05). However, statistical analysis showed significant improvement in the PNF group (group B) in shoulder flexion, abduction and external rotation in comparison to that of the LLLT group (group A) after treatment (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsPNF proved to be more effective than LLLT in increasing ROM but was as effective as LLLT in decreasing shoulder pain and dysfunction in AC post ND surgery.

Analgesic Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy before Heel Lance for Pain Management in Healthy Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Currently, the prevention, assessment, and management of procedural pain in neonates continues to challenge clinicians and researchers. Objective. To investigate the analgesic effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) during heel lance compared to breast milk (BM) feeding in healthy term neonates. In this randomized controlled trial, healthy term neonates who underwent heel lance were randomly assigned to an LLLT or a BM group. The LLLT group received laser therapy to the heel lance site for 20 s before heel lance. The BM group received 5 mL expressed BM via a syringe before heel lance. The primary outcomes were behavioral responses. The secondary outcomes were physiological responses and levels of salivary cortisol and α-amylase. A total of 125 neonates were included, of whom 55 in the LLLT group and 59 in the BM group completed the study. There were no significant differences in latency to first cry and cry duration between the two groups. The squeeze time was significantly shorter in the LLLT group than in the BM group (p = 0.047). There were no significant differences in pain scores, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure before and after heel lance between the two groups. There were no significant differences in salivary cortisol and α-amylase levels in the LLLT group before and after heel lance; however, the differences were significant in the BM group. These findings suggest that the analgesic effect of LLLT is similar to that of BM during heel lance in healthy term neonates. LLLT has potential as an analgesic treatment.

Photobiomodulation Therapy to Treat Snakebites Caused by Bothrops atrox

Bothrops venom acts almost immediately at the bite site and causes tissue damage. To investigate the feasibility and explore the safety and efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing the local manifestations of B atrox envenomations. This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at Fundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado, in Manaus, Brazil. A total of 60 adult participants were included from November 2020 to March 2022, with 30 in each group. Baseline characteristics on admission were similarly distributed between groups. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2022. The intervention group received LLLT combined with regular antivenom treatment. The laser used was a gallium arsenide laser with 4 infrared laser emitters and 4 red laser emitters, 4 J/cm2 for 40 seconds at each application point. Feasibility was assessed by eligibility, recruitment, and retention rates; protocol fidelity; and patients' acceptability. The primary efficacy outcome of this study was myolysis estimated by the value of creatine kinase (U/L) on the third day of follow-up. Secondary efficacy outcomes were (1) pain intensity, (2) circumference measurement ratio, (3) extent of edema, (4) difference between the bite site temperature and that of the contralateral limb, (5) need for the use of analgesics, (6) frequency of secondary infections, and (7) necrosis. These outcomes were measured 48 hours after admission. Disability assessment was carried out from 4 to 6 months after patients' discharge. P values for outcomes were adjusted with Bonferroni correction. A total of 60 patients (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [15.3] years; 8 female individuals [13%] and 52 male individuals [87%]) were included. The study was feasible, and patient retention and acceptability were high. Creatine kinase was significantly lower in the LLLT group (mean [SD], 163.7 [160.0] U/L) 48 hours after admission in relation to the comparator (412.4 [441.3] U/L) (P = .03). Mean (SD) pain intensity (2.9 [2.7] vs 5.0 [2.4]; P = .004), circumference measurement ratio (6.6% [6.6%] vs 17.1% [11.6%]; P < .001), and edema extent (25.8 [15.0] vs 40.1 [22.7] cm; P = .002) were significantly lower in the LLLT group in relation to the comparator. No difference was observed between the groups regarding the mean difference between the bite site temperature and the contralateral limb. Secondary infections, necrosis, disability outcomes, and the frequency of need for analgesics were similar in both groups. No adverse event was observed. The data from this randomized clinical trial suggest that the use of LLLT was feasible and safe in a hospital setting and effective in reducing muscle damage and the local inflammatory process caused by B atrox envenomations. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: RBR-4qw4vf.

Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Shoulder Pain, Functional Disability and Range of Motion in Patients with Type II Slap Tear

BACKGROUND: Low-level lasers may occasionally replace surgery or medications without adverse effects, so studying them stands to reason. It heals, regenerates tissue, reduces inflammation, discomfort, and boosts immunity. Research is continuing. It may help physical therapy, healthcare, and the community by being cost-efficient, simple, and successful. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of low-level laser therapy and routine physical therapy on shoulder pain, functional disability, and range of motion in patients with Type II SLAP tear. METHODS: It was a Randomized Controlled Trial conducted at Physical therapy department, Sialkot Medical and Physiotherapy Center Branches Pasroor and Sambrail. The estimated sample size is 52, and adjusting for an expected 20% dropouts, the sample size was 62, allocated 31 in each group. Both male and female patients with Age between 50-70 years having Type II SLAP tear, Visual analogue scale (VAS) score above 3 and the patients diagnosed by physician, orthopedic physician or surgeon or rheumatologist were included. The included patients were allocated in group A, routine physical therapy, and Group B low level laser. All the patients were assessed at baseline, at 4th week of Treatment and at 8th week of Treatment for pain, shoulder pain and disability index and shoulder ranges. RESULTS: The results regarding age showed mean and standard deviation to be 1.8387±.77875 in routine physical therapy group while 1.8065±.79244 in low level laser therapy group. The comparison of mean SPADI total score at 8th week of assessment it was found to be respectively 58.3226±4.57083 and 50.3871±4.85577 with a significant mean difference of 7.935 in favor of low-level laser therapy as shown by p value 0.000. Other outcome measures including pain and shoulder ranges were also significantly improved in low level laser therapy group, p value &lt; 0.05. CONCUSSION: The findings of the study concluded that low level plays the therapy is significantly more effective improving pain disability and shoulder range of motions in patients with slap tear, except for abduction range of motion which was improved equally in both groups. Moreover, within routine physical therapy and low-level laser therapy group showed significant improvement at pre and post level of assessment except that of total shoulder and pain disability index score which was not improved significantly in routine physical therapy group without combination of low-level laser therapy.

Preclinical study of experimental burns treated with photobiomodulation and Human Amniotic Membrane, both isolated and associated.

to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation with low-level 660 nm laser alone or associated with Human Amniotic Membrane in the repair of partial-thickness burns in rats. an experimental study conducted with 48 male Wistar rats, randomized into four groups: Control, Human Amniotic Membrane, Low-Level Laser Therapy, and Low-Level Laser Therapy associated with Human Amniotic Membrane. The histopathological characteristics of the skin samples were analyzed 7 and 14 days after the burn. The data obtained were submitted to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney tests. the histological analysis of the burn injuries showed a decrease in inflammation (p<0.0001) and an increase in proliferation of fibroblasts (p<0.0001) mainly at 7 days in all treatments related to the control group. At 14 days, the greater effectiveness in accelerating the healing process was significant (p<0.0001) in the Low-Level Laser Therapy group associated with the Human Amniotic Membrane. the association of photobiomodulation therapies with the Human Amniotic Membrane allowed verifying a reduction in the healing process time of the experimental lesions, stimulating its proposal as a treatment protocol in partial-thickness burns.

Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Oral Mucositis in Hematologic Patients Undergoing Transplantation: A Single-Arm Prospective Study.

Oral mucositis significantly affects the quality of life in hematologic cancer patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite global evidence supporting the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for mucositis prevention, its clinical adoption in Japan is limited. This study aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the safety and efficacy of LLLT in a Japanese patient population. In a single-group, non-blinded, exploratory trial, we compared 21 LLLT-treated patients against a historical control of 96 patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade ≥ 2 mucositis, based on NCI-CTCAE ver. 4.0. The LLLT group showed a significantly lower incidence of Grade ≥ 2 mucositis (23.8%) compared to the control group (64.6%) (p = 0.0006). Furthermore, Grade ≥ 2 mucositis correlated with increased oral dryness and longer hospital stays. Our study confirms the efficacy of LLLT in reducing the onset of severe oral mucositis among Japanese hematologic cancer patients, advocating for its clinical introduction as a preventive measure in Japan.

Evaluation of a low-level laser protocol for the control of postoperative pain, trismus, and edema in retained third molar surgeries

This split mouth double-blind randomized trial was aimed to evaluate the effect of low‑level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain, trismus, and swelling used in the postoperative period of surgery of third molars retained. Fifteen patients with symmetrically impacted mandibular third molars were randomized in two groups: LLLT group received only single‑dose intraoral and extraoral immediately after surgery; another group, received LLLT placebo on the other side. They were evaluated on the second and seventh days after surgery, the pain was evaluated in the first day too.  There was no statistical difference in trismus, edema and pain between groups when examining data in the postoperative period of one, two or seven days. The pain level was significantly lower from the first day to seventh day in both groups. The laser group presented a delay or decreasing use of analgesics in the first postoperative day. Despite the statistically insignificant difference results, clinically it has been observed improvement of symptoms of discomfort related by patients. The results suggest that further studies are necessary for protocols consolidation and suggest explore combinations of photodynamic therapies.

Osteogenic potential of apical papilla stem cells mediated by platelet-rich fibrin and low-level laser

To evaluate the osteogenic potential of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on human stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) we isolated, characterized, and then cultured in an osteogenic medium cells with PRF and/or LLLT (660 nm, 6 J/m2-irradiation). Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by bone nodule formation and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP-2 and BMP-4), whereas the molecular mechanisms were achieved by qRT-PCR and RNA-seq analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (p < 0.05* and p < 0.01**). Although PRF and LLLT increased bone nodule formation after 7 days and peaked at 21 days, the combination of PRF + LLLT led to the uppermost nodule formation. This was supported by increased levels of BMP-2 and -4 osteogenic proteins (p < 0.005). Furthermore, the PRF + LLLT relative expression of specific genes involved in osteogenesis, such as osteocalcin, was 2.4- (p = 0.03) and 28.3- (p = 0.001) fold higher compared to the PRF and LLLT groups, and osteopontin was 22.9- and 1.23-fold higher, respectively (p < 0.05), after 7 days of interaction. The transcriptomic profile revealed that the combination of PRF + LLLT induces MSX1, TGFB1, and SMAD1 expression, after 21 days of osteogenic differentiation conditions exposition. More studies are required to understand the complete cellular and molecular mechanisms of PRF plus LLLT on stem cells. Overall, we demonstrated for the first time that the combination of PRF and LLLT would be an excellent therapeutic tool that can be employed for dental, oral, and craniofacial repair and other tissue engineering applications.

Low-level laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy combined with home-based exercise in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized-controlled trial

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) combined with home-based exercise (HBE) versus HBE alone in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). Patients and methods: Between March 2021 and July 2021, a total of 60 patients with SAIS (19 males, 41 females; mean age: 51.3±10.4 years; range, 30 to 70 years) were included. The patients were randomly allocated to an LLLT group (LG), an US therapy group (UG), and a control group (CG). The LLLT and US therapy programs were applied five times a week, for a total of 15 sessions. Home-based exercise programs and cold-pack therapy were administered to patients in each group. The patients were evaluated at baseline and one and three months of follow-up using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain during activity, at rest, and at night, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results: All groups showed a significant improvement in the VAS and SPADI scores after the first month (p&lt;0.05). The VAS activity pain score (p=0.008), SPADI pain score (p=0.003), SPADI disability score (p=0.012), and SPADI total score (p=0.003) significantly decreased in the LG compared to the CG at one month of follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in the outcome measures among the three groups at three months (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: The LLLT combined with HBE is more effective than HBE program alone for relieving activity pain and improving shoulder functions in the short term. However, LLLT and US therapy do not provide additional effects in terms of pain and disability at three months.

Effectiveness of kinesiotape and sham kinesiotape application in children with cerebral palsy with dysphagia: A randomized controlled study

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) combined with home-based exercise (HBE) versus HBE alone in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). Patients and methods: Between March 2021 and July 2021, a total of 60 patients with SAIS (19 males, 41 females; mean age: 51.3±10.4 years; range, 30 to 70 years) were included. The patients were randomly allocated to an LLLT group (LG), an US therapy group (UG), and a control group (CG). The LLLT and US therapy programs were applied five times a week, for a total of 15 sessions. Home-based exercise programs and cold-pack therapy were administered to patients in each group. The patients were evaluated at baseline and one and three months of follow-up using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain during activity, at rest, and at night, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results: All groups showed a significant improvement in the VAS and SPADI scores after the first month (p&lt;0.05). The VAS activity pain score (p=0.008), SPADI pain score (p=0.003), SPADI disability score (p=0.012), and SPADI total score (p=0.003) significantly decreased in the LG compared to the CG at one month of follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in the outcome measures among the three groups at three months (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: The LLLT combined with HBE is more effective than HBE program alone for relieving activity pain and improving shoulder functions in the short term. However, LLLT and US therapy do not provide additional effects in terms of pain and disability at three months.